“Children of Men” has a great
premise. In 2027, humans are
infertile. No one has been born for
about twenty years. The world is dismal,
bombings everywhere, and the U.K. is one of the last functioning places on the
planet. So when Theo Faron’s ex-wife
Julian Taylor persuades him to get transit papers for Kee, he receives the
shock of his life – Kee is pregnant. Now
Theo has to make sure that she gets to safety.
The cinematography is dark and dreary,
reflecting off the unhinged world. The
shaky camera movement adds tension. The style
of “Children of Men” can first be seen in parts of “Harry Potter and the
Prisoner of Azkaban,” where it works incredibly well because it is not
overdone. In “Children of Men,” however,
there is no break from the darkness and grittiness. It works and it doesn’t all at the same time because
there is no break from it.
The long single-shot sequences
work well, capturing pivotal moments in an unblinking time frame.
The movie is long and drawn-out,
which places the audience in the mindset of the people, especially Theo – there
is no hope until he has something to live for (getting Kee to safety).
Good performances by Clive Owen (Theo
Faron) and Michael Caine (Jasper Palmer).
The story itself is where the
problems lie. “Children of Men” is a
simple story placed in a complex environment. I wanted
to watch a complex story in that complex environment. Theo passively lives his life until he actively
works to save someone else. This is a
wonderful transformation and the saving grace of the storyline. The other characters’ interactions are
discombobulated and don’t seem to fit in Theo’s life. Which is why he’s thrown into a new world and
the other characters are so different.
How the movie is made makes sense
and it works, but I wanted more from it.
What did you think of "Children of Men?"
What did you think of "Children of Men?"
No comments:
Post a Comment